The future artist was born in Khabarovsk. His childhood was tragic: when the guy turned five, his dad died by drowning while crossing the river. Mom, left without a breadwinner with two sons in her arms, was forced to leave closer to her family - to Nikopol, Ukraine. Evgeniy spent his childhood and youth there.
In Ukraine, the boy went not only to a regular school, but also to a music school. Noticing his talents, the mother sent the child to learn to play the violin. However, in addition to music, he will also be interested in sports. The teenager's passion will be boxing, which Dyatlov will master on his own.
Faculty of Philology
The boy was collected and serious: he had school, music and his little brother. The boys' mother, a biology and chemistry teacher, was in love with her subjects and spent a lot of time at school. The brothers had no choice but to study well and behave well.
Zhenya did best in humanities subjects and adored literature. After school, he entered the philological department of Kharkov University, but two years later he joined the army. There a magical deep baritone revealed itself. Friends called Dyatlov “a man-orchestra” and predicted a great career as an artist. So far he was distrustful of these words.
Artist
Returning home, the guy went to work at a factory: he had to help his mother, and the university no longer attracted him. But even at the factory, the artistic Zhenya made great strides in amateur performances.
The plant management quickly noticed this and literally began to persuade the guy not to stay as an ordinary worker, but to try his hand at a theater university. Now Zhenya himself began to believe in his own strength.
The student recorded an album together with “AuktYon”
He left Ukraine straight for St. Petersburg and entered LGITMiK the first time. It is known that during his studies the student recorded an album together with “AuktYon”, which was called “How I became a traitor.”
After university, he joined the Buff Theater, and from there he ended up in the youth theater on the Fontanka, where his first wife Dasha Yurgens played.
Television, music
Evgeniy’s career on television was also successful. Over the years, Dyatlov hosted the programs “The Age of Cavalry Guards” and “The Investigative Committee.” He also had the opportunity to appear on the TV show “Romance of Romance” several times.
Evgeniy announced his singing talent thanks to the music show “Two Stars”. He and Diana Arbenina managed to take second place, this duet received a special prize from the prima donna Alla Pugacheva. Their performance of the song “I Love You to Tears” made a great impression on the audience and the jury.
From time to time, Dyatlov pleases his fans with solo concerts and tours major cities in Russia. The songs evoke a storm of emotions in listeners. For example, the composition “Carefree Dreams,” which Dyatlov presented to the public during the anniversary evening of Vladimir Evzerov in 2014, gained extraordinary popularity. Also, many appreciated the romance “Prayer” from the film “Scavenger”.
In 2020, the actor became one of the participants in the TV show “Exactly the Same.” He brilliantly impersonated Adriano Celentano, Mikhail Boyarsky, Frank Sinatra, Vakhtang Kikabidze and other famous personalities. In the third season of the television program, he and Maxim Galkin took first place. In subsequent years, the artist also took part in the popular project “Exactly the Same”.
// Photo: Sergey Ivanov/PhotoXPress.ru
After a divorce from actress Daria Lesnikova, Evgeny Dyatlov’s son stayed to live with her. The heir to the artists, Egor, is now 25 years old, and his relationship with his father is going through hard times. Evgeniy himself finds it difficult to bear the separation from his son and is seriously concerned about how their communication is proceeding.
“Egor and I are not in a quarrel,” Evgeny Dyatlov tells StarHit. “Our life is busy, that’s the way it is.” When the son comes with the words “Dad, let’s sit,” and the father is in Irkutsk at that moment... When I come to Moscow for one day, I immediately run, for example, to the filming of the program “Exactly the Same.” I am in the same position as him. He has his own business, I have mine.”
Dyatlov's eldest son followed in the footsteps of his parents. Like most aspiring actors, Yegor has already faced a number of difficulties. Constant castings and auditions have become an integral part of the guy’s life. At the same time, the heir to the Russian cinema star was known as an exemplary family man - he is married to actress Natalya, with whom he is raising a little daughter.
A tense relationship with his son prevents Evgeny Dyatlov from meeting his granddaughter. The last time the grandfather saw the baby was in 2020 at a family holiday. But Dyatlov tries to remind his granddaughter about himself from time to time. For example, he recently donated a handmade pillow with a bright image. They explained to the little girl that her grandfather had given her a present.
“The child doesn’t know me,” Evgeniy admitted. “The main thing for him is to love his parents and be with them all the time.” And grandparents are like an app. When we had grandparents, they lived their lives, and we went about our business. They are a backup. There are times when even the best."
The artist himself has no less troubles in life. Dyatlov is raising his nine-year-old daughter Vasilisa, born in marriage to actress Yulia Dzherbinova. Now the man is thinking about how he can transport his brother from Ukraine to Russia. In addition, Evgeniy is constantly on the road - the artist is busy filming and in various productions with which he tours. In a word, he simply does not have time to communicate with his son. The celebrity admits that, perhaps, it is for this reason that he cannot establish relations with the 25-year-old heir.
“I can be in Vladivostok,” continues Evgeny Dyatlov. -It's a different time zone. But Yegor may not know this - he calls only when he needs financial help. He is not against establishing communication, but it must come from both sides. Ideally, of course, someday we will sit by the fireplace, drinking red wine... We will talk to each other and tell us what we could have done during this time and how to solve everything. There is no such possibility yet.”
The actor-womanizer forgave rocker Yuri Shevchuk for seducing his wife
The actor-womanizer forgave rocker Yuri Shevchuk for seducing his wife
The Rossiya channel released the film The White Guard, where Evgeny DYATLOV plays the role of the noble lieutenant Leonid Shervinsky, selflessly in love with one and only woman - Elena Turbina, whose hand and heart he so beautifully seeks. In life, a successful actor and performer of romances is not at all monogamous. As Evgeny admitted, he cheated on both his first wife, actress Daria YURGENS, and his second, Katya DYATLOVA.
With Evgeny Dyatlov
we met in Moscow, in his small one-room apartment.
Unwashed dishes and crumbs on the table indicated that for the artist this was more of a temporary shelter than a permanent place of residence. As you know,
he lives in St. Petersburg Yulia Dzherbinova
“I just returned from a concert in Ryazan,” Evgeniy explained. — I celebrated my 49th birthday there. We drank after the performance, then on the train, so I haven’t come to my senses yet.
The film “The White Guard” was just shown on the screen, and Zhenya shared his impressions with interest.
Mikhail Porechenkov also auditioned for it
.
And Myshlaevsky was supposed to be played by Vladimir Mashkov
, but he refused. Thus, Porechenkov was given the role of Myshlaevsky, which he also, ironically, plays in the play.
— Were there White Guards in your family?
On my mother’s side, all were wealthy peasants, for which they were dispossessed of kulaks, and then forced to leave for the Far East. I don’t know anything on my father’s side. Dad died early. He was a driver and during a business trip he transported a truck across a Siberian river. Something happened: the pole broke, my legs were caught. He drowned. After my father died, my mother never remarried.
— Wasn’t your father’s upbringing enough?
More like daddy's attention. Although I studied well at school, I was not an excellent student. I can say: they gave marks for beautiful eyes. And now, give me a problem, I can’t solve it. That’s probably why he became an actor. But despite all my immaturity, I began to live independently early: immediately after serving in the army, I moved into a hostel.
Forbidden to communicate with my son
— Have you heard what Daria Yurgens talks about your relationship?
We were married for only three years, but from her words you get the feeling that it’s been twenty years. And why remember the past now? Unclear. We got married in our fourth year, and after graduating from the Leningrad Theater Institute, she was immediately taken to the Youth Theater on Fontanka, and I worked at the Buff Theater. Dasha always wanted to work, but she went on maternity leave because she was pregnant. She was then approved for the role of Katerina in “The Thunderstorm,” and the director was waiting for her to return from maternity leave. Six months later, Dasha began rehearsing, but the role was given to another actress because she couldn’t handle it.
— You got married in your fourth year at LGITMiK. Was it great love or youthful infatuation?
It seems to me that Dasha didn’t love me at all.
She now gives interviews in a light that is favorable to her. This is part of a series of labeling: womanizer, scoundrel, asshole. You can't treat a person like that. — Dasha says that you didn’t earn anything and she, being pregnant, ate loaves of bread and kefir...
It’s not to say that I didn’t earn money. It was such a time, Yeltsin’s predatory reforms, 1992. Actors did not have such large fees back then. I was working, Dasha was on maternity leave. It was hard for about six months. My son Yegor was born on January 20, and this is the time of New Year's performances, so I disappeared into the theater.
— How did it happen that Yegor’s son doesn’t have your last name?
I was not informed that my son’s last name was not Dyatlov, but Jurgens. And after the divorce, which occurred a year after Yegor was born, Dasha forbade me to communicate with the child. I didn't have the opportunity to turn the situation around.
- Dasha says that you didn’t pay child support...
She herself did not file for alimony, because she understood that then I would demand the right to see my son. And I was asked not to appear in her new husband’s house. Egor considered another person to be his dad - Dasha’s second husband, actor Pyotr Zhuravlev
. I think this is a big mistake. Dasha broke up with Petya after seven years, and the boy found out about me. But this period of fatherhood was missed, so he has no internal attraction to me. Egor knows that I am a dad, but he has no need for me. The eldest son never calls and is not interested in me. And you must admit, it’s kind of stupid to do this unless necessary. Of course, adults are to blame for this situation.
I regret what I said about cheating
— Was it different with your second wife Katya?
With Katya everything was different. She gave my last name to her son Fyodor, and took it herself. We have a great relationship.
- Why did you leave Katya?
Met someone else. There was a period of crisis in my life. It happened.
Dasha tells what a blow it was for her when you yourself told her about the betrayal with the actress of the Buff Theater. Have you said this to all women's faces?
I regret that I told Dasha about this. After that, I came to the priest: I explained the situation, that I confessed to my wife of cheating. Father said that I shouldn’t have done it and that it’s wrong to do that. I had to come to him and confess. He says: “You feel better, but that person doesn’t.” A betrayed spouse becomes a dragon who bites his own tail and feels below par. That’s why I didn’t do this again after Dasha. I didn’t tell my second wife Katerina about the betrayal, but everything was revealed without me.
Dasha’s romance with rock singer Yuri Shevchuk took place before your eyes when you were still married. How did you cope?
Anything can happen. A person goes off the rails or off the hook, or vice versa, it seems to him that he has everything, he can do more, but then a crisis comes. I'm not offended by Yura.
— Do you forgive women’s infidelities?
Previously, I didn’t have the strength to forgive. There was a thought in my head: it will hurt me because I forgive. Now I can say: “The room has become wider.” I suspect I can. I have reached a new frontier when you want to fix everything if you mess up.
— Weren’t you offended by Dasha’s words: “All the men who met on my way were stupid as traffic jams”?
In many ways, these words relate to the person who speaks them.
— Isn’t it a shame that your wife Yulia didn’t give your last name to her daughter Vasilisa?
No. Since she decided so, then I don’t give a damn.
— How did Julia congratulate you on your birthday?
She likes to give gifts: for this birthday she bought me a jacket and razors. And Dasha Yurgens
sent an SMS congratulating me on behalf of myself and my son.
— What are you teaching your daughter Vasilisa?
I don’t adhere to any rules or loud principles. I want to explain something to the child, but it should not be moral teaching. My mother fought with my brother and me by setting standards and reading morals. And now, if I argue with my mother, I notice an unnecessary, elevated intonation that appears when talking to her. This is the child’s reaction to moral teaching.
— Did you have problems with alcohol?
There was never any addiction. Three years ago I drank, I even lay under IVs and cleaned myself. Outwardly everything was fine, but internal problems were gnawing at me. Today I may drink, I may not. I can smoke, I can refuse.
In this funny way, the popular actor treated his wife for kidney disease
For some reason, our actors who have achieved fame and popularity do not want to remember their ex-wives, calling them their mistakes in their youth. They prefer to show an ideal glossy life: a young beautiful wife, an excellent home, a strong rear. Evgeny DYATLOV is no exception. He speaks with adoration about his third wife, Yulia DZHERBINOVA, but remains silent about his former ones, Daria YURGENS and Katya DYATLOVA. They, on the contrary, have something to remember. In the last issue of Express Gazeta we published a scandalous interview with Dyatlov’s first wife, actress Daria Yurgens, and now we met with Ekaterina.
Katerina Dyatlova
works as an acting assistant at the Lenfilm film studio.
She doesn’t like to talk about the period of her life with Zhenya, who shines on the screen and on stage. She doesn’t want to bask in the rays of his glory, and she doesn’t need to. What she has left from her once beloved man is their common son Fyodor, for whom she tries to be a good mother. — Katya, tell me how you met?
- Funny.
I had problems with my kidneys, and my friends told me: “Now we will bring you a boy who will cure you.” They brought Zhenya. He then did some soul-searching, read all sorts of clever medical books and became interested in urine therapy - he drank urine. Zhenya tested this method on himself, and I must say that I also took part in it. — Was Evgeny still married to actress Daria Yurgens?
- Yes.
We met in May 1993 and got married in 1994. At the time we met, I was in love with another person, to whom I was supposed to fly to Germany. A plane ticket was purchased. In the end, because of Dyatlov,
I didn’t fly anywhere.
- How did he fascinate you?
- You know how it happens: I sang songs with a guitar, and like a girl, I melted.
On the third day he proposed to me. I didn’t accept it right away. It was not easy: I have a child from my first marriage, he has a little son from actress Dasha Yurgens
Egor. I understood what it was like to already have my own experience behind me. But for some reason I didn’t feel like I was breaking up someone else’s family and taking him away. Probably because Zhenya immediately explained to me that he is a free man. But I doubted it.
The wedding was paid for by Oleg Pogudin
- How did he look after you?
- ABOUT!
Zhenya knows how to do this: he always gave flowers and something else. He is a generous person, ready to give himself completely to another person. This is not always good because it can be used to make ropes. — Did you start living together when Dyatlov was not yet such a popular artist?
- Yes, he had a different demand, and he was not so famous.
When we got married, they lived with my parents, then in a communal apartment. These were difficult years. I became pregnant, but there was no money for a doctor. His classmate and friend, the now famous singer Oleg Pogudin,
helped us as best he could. It was he who paid for the doctor and all medical services during pregnancy. So I gave birth with Pogudin’s money. Oleg simply said: “Let me help.” He is a churchgoer. And he did our wedding. The wedding was noisy. We were hanging out at my house: my dad sang songs, rock and roll friends came. Overall, it was fun.
From his second marriage, the actor has a son, Fyodor (photo dyatlov.forum24.ru) |
- Why did you break up?
— When, after seven years of marriage, the relationship began to deteriorate, we decided to separate.
I found out about one betrayal, then Zhenya went to work at the St. Petersburg Satire Theater, and Yulia appeared ( Yulia Dzherbinova
is the third wife of Evgeniy Dyatlov. -
N.M.
), who also worked as an actress there.
— Blame Dyatlov for betrayal?
“I can’t blame him for anything.”
I won't say he's an asshole. I saw that he loved me, that’s why I was terribly jealous. I understood him and love him in my own way. There was, of course, one time when I was filled with pride, when I was angry. But that's in the past. Zhenya is not entirely to blame for everything. I was probably not the wisest woman: I had to try to save the family, but for me the most important thing at that time was love. I think a significant role in the separation was played by the fact that we were too similar to each other, and our birthdays are nearby: mine is on February 28, and Zhenya’s is on March 2. We divorced, but I didn’t run to change Dyatlov’s last name. I truly loved him. Our son Fyodor is also Dyatlov. Zhenya loves him, helps him, nurtures him. —You didn’t get married? - No, although I have another person. You know, it’s difficult to find a worthy replacement after Zhenya.
She wanted a baby
Actually, they met in first year. She first saw him in a large group of students, at dusk on the eve of the opening of the bridges. A handsome guy sang with a guitar in a gentle, strong baritone.
“You know, Zhenya, I would like to have a child with you,” chirped the inspired, very young Dasha. Then he just twirled his finger at his temple. However, a year later the couple had already moved in together, then got married, and after another two they were actually expecting a child.
She sobbed over the letters that Zhenya sent from Ukraine, begging her to forgive him.
The marriage ended sadly: while leaving to visit his mother, right at the station Zhenya admitted that he had cheated on Dasha. She watched the train with a sad look for a long time, was very upset about the betrayal, and then sobbed over the letters that Zhenya sent from Ukraine, begging to forgive him.
Malakhov said on air that Dyatlov’s group could have included the children of the commander-in-chief of the Urals Military District Lelyushenko
https://www.znak.com/2019-03-22/v_efire_u_malahova_zayavili_chto_v_gruppe_dyatlova_mogli_byt_deti_glavkoma_urvo_lelyushenko 2019.03.22
Photos from the last expedition of the Dyatlov groupPublic domain
The children of the legendary General Dmitry Lelyushenko, who at that time commanded the Ural Military District, may have participated in the hike of a group of UPI student tourists Igor Dyatlov, who died under mysterious circumstances in February 1959 on the slopes of Mount Kholatchakhl, or Mountain of the Dead, in the Northern Urals . The former head of the historical and ethnographic museum in the city of Ivdel, Vera Bellendir, stated this today on Andrei Malakhov’s “Live Broadcast” program on the Rossiya TV channel.
Ivdel, let us remind you, is the largest populated area closest to the site of the tragedy. Bellendir, who was 14 years old at the time, heard from her father that the deceased group of tourists included the children of the commander-in-chief of the Urals Military District. In the 1950s, he served as secretary of the Ivdel CPSU city committee for ideology.
Vera Bellendir and Andrey MalakhovScreen from the release of the “Live Broadcast” program on the Rossiya TV channel
In an interview with Andrei Malakhov, the woman said that she overheard her parents’ conversation. “Mom says: “It’s clear that I feel sorry for the children, but why is there such attention to this?” The father replies: “What do you want, the son and daughter of the commander of the Ural Military District died there!” There were three girls there. Lelyushenko was here several times, and everyone said that he was in a very depressed state. Kirilenko, the first secretary of the regional party committee, also flew in with him. They were still very friendly. And dad certainly knew all this.”
The organizer of the search for the Dyatlov group - about what and why the investigation hid it 59 years ago
Bellendir also clarified that her father also adhered to the version that the tourists died as a result of the explosion of a rocket. “The fact that the guys set up the tent absolutely illiterately from the point of view of experienced tourists suggests that their tasks were different, not just a tourist trip. Lelyushenko’s children could hear from their father’s conversations that there would be some tests and begged to go there. And [Semyon] Zolotarev had to keep an eye on them. He alone did not fit into this entire group. But everything went so wrong that the entire group died. But there were 11 of them. There were extra things there, an extra ski and boots, and a lot of food,” Bellendir added.
Writer Daria Dontsova, who also took part in the “Live Broadcast” program, said that she heard something similar from her father, who was also once a major political figure.
Irina LelyushenkoScreen from the release of the “Live Broadcast” program on the Rossiya TV channel
However, the general’s great-niece Irina Lelyushenko said that she did not consider this version to be true. “His only natural son, Boris Dmitrievich, was seriously injured on a motorcycle and limped very badly when walking, he could hardly walk - there was no talk of climbing the mountain,” the woman said. By the way, Boris Lelyushenko died in 1993 and was buried next to his father. Lelyushenko also had an adopted daughter, Svetlana. “She was a medical student and also didn’t go anywhere,” added Irina Lelyushenko. According to her, Svetlana Lelyushenko also lived for a long time after the events of 60 years ago in the Northern Urals. She later met her real mother and moved to Sakhalin.
Dmitry LelyushenkoPublic domain
The last campaign of Igor Dyatlov’s group was dedicated to the XXI Congress of the CPSU. In 15 days, the participants of the trip had to ski 300 kilometers through the mountain-taiga part of the north of the Sverdlovsk region and climb two peaks - Mount Otorten and Oika-Chakur.
Initially, there were 10 participants in the hike: 5th year student of the UPI radio department Igor Dyatlov (the leader of the hike), his classmate Zinaida Kolmogorova, UPI graduate and at that time employee of the closed SverdNIIkhimmash Rustem Slobodin, 4th year student of the UPI radio department Yuri Doroshenko, engineer plant "Mayak" Georgy Krivonischenko, graduate of the construction faculty of UPI Nikolay Thibault-Brignolle, 4th year student of the same faculty Lyudmila Dubinina, war veteran, instructor of the Kourovsky tourist center Semyon Zolotarev, 4th year student of the UPI physics and technology Alexander Kolevatov, 4th student course of the Faculty of Engineering and Economics of UPI Yuri Yudin.
Photo from the Dyatlov group’s hike, in which the silhouettes of eleven people can be seen Screen from the release of the “Live Broadcast” program on the Rossiya TV channel
On January 23, 1959, the group left Sverdlovsk by train for Serov, and from there further, by another train, to Ivdel. On January 26, the Dyatlovites hitched a ride to the logging village of the 41st quarter, which previously existed behind the village of Vizhay. On January 27, tourists and a fellow traveler walked from the village of 41st quarter to the village of 2nd Severny. There we spent the night in one of the houses. On January 28, the guide and Yuri Yudin, who felt unwell, returned back (they walked separately). And Igor Dyatlov’s group moved further along the route. No one saw them alive again. According to the investigation materials, they died on the night of February 1-2 in the area of Mount Kholatchakhl, or the Mountain of the Dead, in the Northern Urals. However, due to the remoteness of the territory where the emergency occurred, they learned about it much later. Only towards the end of February, when it became clear that the group had not returned from the hike, did the search begin.
The prosecutor's office revealed the details of the case of the death of the Dyatlov group, explaining almost all the inconsistencies
The tent was found on February 26 in what is now called the Dyatlov Pass. A few hours later, the bodies of the group members began to be found. Their search lasted until May. Attention was immediately drawn to the fact that the Dyatlov group’s tent was cut open, and the dead had rather strange injuries. Thus, Dubinina was diagnosed with an extensive fracture of the ribs, hemorrhage in the right ventricle of the heart, and the absence of a tongue in the oral cavity. Zolotarev also has broken ribs with internal bleeding. Slobodin and Thibault-Brignolle had serious fractures of their skulls. Krivonischenko has II-III degree burns. Some also had missing eyes, and their cheeks and lips were torn (or eaten away). In addition, many people who saw the dead noted a strange brick-red color of their skin and caked foam near the mouth.
The conclusion reached by the investigation seemed no less unusual. According to him, nine travelers were victims of “force majeure circumstances.” All this subsequently gave rise to a lot of versions about the reasons for their death, including very incredible ones: from an avalanche to ritual murder by local Mansi. Among others, the so-called “missile version” was heard - Dyatlov’s group died when they got into an area where they were testing missile weapons. The exact answer to the question of what happened at the pass is still unknown.
The tourist who was the first to find the tent of the Dyatlov group in 1959 speaks about a new investigation
On February 1 of this year, 60 years after the tragedy, the Prosecutor General's Office of the Russian Federation announced the resumption of the investigation into the circumstances of the death of tourists in 1959.
Three versions of what happened are given priority: an avalanche, a snowboard (smaller avalanche), a hurricane. Last week, prosecutors visited the Dyatlov Pass, where they conducted a number of examinations. In parallel with them, an expedition was working there, organized by the Rossiya-1 TV channel and the Komsomolskaya Pravda publication, in which Andrei Malakhov took personal part. Do you want independent media in the country? Support Znak.com
Share
Author
Igor Pushkarev
On this topic:
Dyatlov Pass
Participants in the search for the Dyatlov group made a statement UrFU refused to host a conference on the death of the Dyatlov group in 1959 Relatives of those killed in the Dyatlov Pass were unable to get Putin to get a new investigation Sverdlovsk prosecutor found a replacement for the initiator of the investigation into the case of the death of the Dyatlov group The investigator in the case of the death of the Dyatlov group received a post in To the Prosecutor General's Office of the Russian Federation, the sister of the deceased Igor Dyatlov - about versions of the death of a tourist group in the mountains of the Urals. The mayor of Yekaterinburg will be asked to protect the graves of the Dyatlov group from illegal exhumation. Relatives of the Dyatlov group victims who died in 1959 decided to contact Putin directly. transferred to the Investigative Committee of the Russian Federation The sister of Igor Dyatlov, who died with his group in 1959, turned to Bastrykin. Relatives of those killed at the Dyatlov Pass will demand that Bastrykin resume the investigation. The prosecutor's office conducted an experiment on Mount Belaya, recreating the scenario of the death of the Dyatlov group. Experts refuted the version of the prosecutor's office about the natural factors that led to the death of the Dyatlov group. Helicopter with Andrey The Malakhovs managed to land him at the Dyatlov Pass only on the second attempt. “Be careful, Andrey.” Malakhov, on the way to the Dyatlov Pass, arrived in Ivdel. Andrey Malakhov with the film crew of “Russia-1” flies to the Dyatlov Pass. Representatives of the Dyatlov Group Memory Foundation will not go with the prosecutor’s office to the pass. The prosecutor’s office, which dealt with the death of the Dyatlov group, was asked to check the Makeev GCC. The Discovery film crew went to the Dyatlov Pass to recreate the tragedy. 1959 The prosecutor's office revealed the details of the case of the death of the Dyatlov group, explaining almost all the inconsistencies. The Russian Federation has authorized a new investigation into the death of the Dyatlov group. Statement: “Cut straight from the tent.” On the 60th anniversary of the death of the Dyatlov group, unique facts will be made public. Acquaintances reported the disappearance of a tourist on the Dyatlov Pass. Tourists found an airplane abandoned 47 years ago in the taiga near the Dyatlov Pass. The organizer of the search for the Dyatlov group - about what and why the investigation hid 59 years ago. Sverdlovsk rescuers found a man lost on the Dyatlov Pass. tourist and take him home Sverdlovsk rescuers will go to look for the missing tourist in the Dyatlov Pass area A US film crew is sent to the Urals to shoot a new film about the Dyatlov group The Dyatlov Group Memory Fund will ask the authorities for 2 billion for the road to the pass Akunin asked to help him choose the plot of a new book. Leading - Dyatlov Pass On the Dyatlov Pass, where a tourist froze to death, they can install heating points. From the Dyatlov Pass, due to heavy rain, they cannot pick up the body of a tourist for two days. A radio amateur found a bunker at the Dyatlov Pass, as in the US film about the death of the group. A military doctor told his version of the death of the Dyatlov group. Before A helicopter taxi will be launched from the Dyatlov Pass for 48 thousand rubles. A tourism project is being made from the Dyatlov Pass. Now you can go there on all-terrain vehicles Rossel: archival documents about the death of the Dyatlov group are still classified Researchers of the Dyatlov Pass are going on a new expedition Researchers of the Dyatlov Pass have found a new place where the remains of the group were Rescuers brought to Yekaterinburg a tourist who was injured in the Dyatlov Pass A tourist was injured in the Dyatlov Pass To the pass Dyatlov will send a new expedition: “We will definitely find something”Ekaterinburg tourist, who was searched for on the Dyatlov Pass, refused to return from the routeRescuers found a tourist who disappeared on the Dyatlov Pass, she is aliveAdditional forces were deployed in search of a 30-year-old tourist who disappeared on the Dyatlov PassAt the Dyatlov Pass the search continues for a tourist who disappeared three days ago. A 30-year-old experienced tourist disappeared at the Dyatlov Pass. A corpse was found near the only Buddhist temple in the Urals. Investigators are ready to hand over the body of the deceased Chelyabinsk tourist to relatives. A ban on excursions to the Mountain of Stone Blocks has been introduced. Operational footage from the Dyatlov Pass, where a Chelyabinsk tourist died, has been published. A tourist who received frostbite on the Dyatlov Pass discharged from the hospital Forensic experts have found out why the hermit died on the Dyatlov Pass Experts cannot perform an autopsy on the body of a tourist who died on the Dyatlov Pass of a man who died in the Dyatlov Pass area. Rescuers and an investigator are making their way to the Dyatlov Pass, where the body of a tourist was found
Russian news
Russia
The Investigative Committee commented on the death of the world champion in powerlifting
Russia
In Moscow, 71 patients with coronavirus died in the last 24 hours
Baza journalist Anna Nikitina
Russia
The Investigative Committee refused to initiate a case due to the beating of a Baza journalist during a search by FSB officers
Russia
Beauty salons, massage rooms, saunas, spa salons and solariums will open in the Moscow region
Russia
Passengers of the Surgut-Tyumen flight who survived an emergency landing arrived in Roshchino
Russia
Sobyanin considers voting on amendments to the Constitution timely, despite COVID-19
Russia
Elon Musk's Dragon Crew flight to the ISS could be fatal for the Russian space industry
United Democrats left Mikhail Khodorkovsky's Open Russia
Russia
How the United Democrats, supported by Khodorkovsky, will lead 650 politicians to the elections
Russian President Vladimir Putin
Russia
Putin signed a decree on a new date for voting on amendments to the Constitution
Russia
The party of Faberlic owner Alexei Nechaev received the right to participate in the elections
Russia
The plane flying from Surgut to Tyumen returned to its departure point and made an emergency landing
Russia
Six pickets in support of Ilya Azar have already been detained in Moscow
Russia
Churches are opening for parishioners in Moscow
Ivan Eremin
Russia
The new owner of Vedomosti talks about connections with Rosneft and his plans for the editorial office
Russia
Putin explained why he introduced a law with references to the new Constitution into the State Duma before the vote
Russia
Vladimir Putin announced the date of the popular vote on amendments to the Constitution
Russia
The Ministry of Finance plans to classify state procurements of the FSO and the Russian Guard
Russia
The head of Rosselkhoznadzor, Sergei Dankvert, filed a statement of defamation against him with the police.
Russia
In Moscow, a police lieutenant colonel with coronavirus fell from a hospital window
Ekaterinburg
Source: the State Archives of the Russian Federation conducted a seizure in the case of the death of Nicholas II and his family
Read where it's convenient
Znak.com
Follow @znak_com
Regions:
ALL TOGETHERSPBEKATERINBURGCHELYABINSKKURGANTYUMENYANAOKHMAO
Categories:
YELTSIN CENTERPODCASTESTECHLIFE WITH THE MINDFOTAINMENTOPINIONREAL ESTATE
Sections:
ADVERTISINGEDITIONARCHIVTEGIRSS
© News Agency “Znak”
Editor-in-chief Kolezev D.E., Founder: Panova O.R.
Media registration certificate No. FS77-53553 dated April 4, 2013. Issued by the Federal Service for Supervision of Communications, Information Technologies and Mass Communications (Roskomnadzor)
Editorial address: 620026, Ekaterinburg, st. Mamina-Sibiryaka, 126 Tel., e-mail: [email protected]
The opinion of the editors may not coincide with the opinion of individual authors. When using site materials, a link is required.
For persons over 18 years of age.
The same rake
At first she forgave, then, either out of resentment and despair, or sincerely and headlong, she plunged into a new novel. She was angry with Dyatlov for so long that she even gave their son Yegor her real last name - Lesnikov. Only after a while the couple was able to reach friendly notes in their relationship. Evgeniy never lost touch with his son.
The handsome man was very attracted to the weaker sex.
After the dramatic story, Dyatlov met another woman. She was not public, little is known about this marriage. The girl's name was Ekaterina, they did not live together for long, but managed to have offspring.
From this marriage, Dyatlov had a second son, Fedor. And family ties were again cracked at the seams due to Eugene’s betrayal. The handsome man was very attracted to the weaker sex.
Alternative view
All materials given in the article are taken from here.
I express my deep gratitude to “Citizen” Anton Sizykh for his help in preparing the article.
—
60 years later, Igor Dyatlov’s tourist group again reaches the peak of mass attention.
An official investigation in 1959 ruled the incident an accident caused by a force of nature. However, due to the lack of accurate information about the circumstances of the death of the group, various woodpecker experts have created many alternative versions, the number of which today is no less than varieties of sausage.
But no matter what fantastic and delusional clues are thrown in for public use, they all sacredly protect, and do not touch, no matter how wild the imagination, the fact or circumstance that is hidden most of all - the time and place of death.
According to legend, a criminal case without a number about the death of UPI students was found in the late 80s by some girl on a windowsill; no one had been able to find it before. Which already, as it were, hints at the possibility of its falsity (not completely, but partially).
Promotional video:
Forensic expert Natalya Sakharova, naturally, could not help but notice that this case was a white thread. I will quote an important part (critical-analytical) of her opinion:
The inspection of the scene of the incident (OSI) was carried out extremely carelessly:
— the following picture near the tent is not reflected: how the snow is located, in layers or sediments, what is under the snow when removing it layer by layer;
— there is no description of the tracks of footprints with measurements, there is no indication of the presence or absence of traces of falls or dragging;
— there is no exact description of the location of objects found near the tent indicating distances (clothes, slippers);
— the outer part was not examined for traces of blood spatter;
— there is no exact description of the arrangement of things inside the tent with a diagram of their location in the form of a picture.
There are completely no professionally made photo tables - especially photographs made according to the rules of forensic photography (orienting, including from several points: key points - the tent on four sides, the contents inside the tent; detailed - damage with a scale bar). In the case there is only everyday amateur photography. There are no properly taken photographs of footprints. The photos were taken at an angle, without filters, without a ruler or a reference object (in the absence of a ruler, you can use a “standard” box of matches). There are no photographs of the layer-by-layer removal of corpses, recording of objects around them, details of their clothing. In fact, there is NOTHING.
The rules of forensic photography have been known since the late thirties and, of course, in the mid-fifties, and such a gross violation of an examination in such a serious, high-profile case is almost impossible to imagine. I believe that these photographs of weapons of mass destruction were still taken, but they were removed from the case materials. Photographs allow you to give the most objective picture of the scene of the incident and are the most reliable information. But it is missing, replaced by numerous, with varying interpretations, subjective testimony of witnesses.
I analyzed the available photographic materials. Here, for example, is a tent. The snow around lies in layers, without any markings. I assume that the area near the tent was deliberately covered with snow to hide traces (of shoes, wrestling, dragging, where the guys left the tent). With such an arrangement of snow on the tent, it is impossible to make linear cuts in the side panel - it must be stretched. That is, the cuts were made before the snow was added...
And according to the examination of the tent itself:
The traceological examination of the damage to the tent was carried out by one expert, who also had little work experience. Such extensive examinations of high-profile cases, both then and now, are carried out only on commission, by no less than two experts.
In this case, the examination was performed at a low professional level:
— there is no photograph of the general view of the tent stretched out in the laboratory for inspection;
— the pattern of damage on the tent does not correspond to its actual location;
- there is no detailed description of the condition of the internal and external sides - burns, cuts, scratches, traces of repair, layers (blood),
— the damage is described selectively, which is a gross, unacceptable mistake and distorts the picture of the traces as a whole;
— there is no description of general signs of damage, which makes it possible to determine group signs of trace-forming objects (knife or ice ax);
— there is no description of the general signs of ruptures, the direction of application of force during ruptures (from the outside or from the inside);
— there is no description of the point of initial impact (where the cut or rupture began);
- there are no photographs from a microscope confirming the most important thing - where the cuts were made. There are none! Although the method of photographing using a microscope was successfully developed back in the thirties.
There is also no reliable description of what was seen under the microscope - the direction of the bevel of the end parts at the cut sites, their disintegration, the direction of the ends of the threads. THERE IS NOTHING!
I think that the expert did not use a microscope. To do this, it was necessary to excise part of the canvas, which must be indicated in the research section. What didn't happen didn't happen. The word “thorough research” is not an argument for an expert.
What is important is that an expert experiment was not carried out on a similar product: cut the tent from the inside to the same dimensions as the one under study, let several people climb out of it, see if it is even possible to get out like that and how the tent behaves after that - falls, folds, stays sustainable. An expert experiment is part of an examination and can be carried out within the framework of the so-called “expert initiative,” which was then and now provided for by law. An expert experiment proves or refutes any investigative version. But this was not done. Why?
I consider such an investigation to be completely unreliable. Based on only one visual inspection, which was exactly what was done by the expert, it was not worth drawing the “necessary” conclusions - on which side the cuts were made.
Engaging an inexperienced expert to conduct an examination, who is also clearly poorly trained in the area of traceology, is very alarming. But the results of the examination were decisive for the entire case; the expert, as the analysis of the examination shows, did not cope with the task due to his incompetence and therefore could provide an incorrect conclusion. It is also extremely unusual that no one from the expert department was involved as a specialist to conduct weapons of mass destruction. In the fifties, unlike our time, there was no categorical requirement to include experts in the investigative team. Such a decision could be made by the prosecutor who conducted the investigation and decided to strengthen the group. Despite the obvious need for a specialist from the expert unit, not one of them was involved in the inspection.
Next, the reconstruction part is useless: I guess, I guess... and off came the action movie, one of dozens of similar bestsellers. Any experts, both fake ones from the media and real ones, are prohibited from taking away the time and place of death from the date of February 1 and the place of “location”.
All woodpecker experts, with all versions, are obliged to lead away from only one fact: the death of the group is a complete sham, only those killed in it are real, everything else (the camp, storage shed, parking areas and other little things) is just scenery.
Longitudinal sections of the tent.
Since the case materials do not contain specific studies and examinations about cutting the tent from the inside, although some of the cuts were photographed and described, all statements about cuts exclusively from the inside are untrue and exist only in the minds of conspiracy theorists.
They talked about so much in articles, posts, and forums about who cut it and how. From militants with the massacre of a group of GRU-CRU-special teams to laser weapons of space aliens.
Everything is very simple. A folded tent was cut roughly along the edges, resulting in even cuts when unfolding the tent. This can be done with any sharpened tool on a block. The prop man, without sweating for a long time, peeled the edge of the folded tent. The woodpecker community had enough of this riddle for half a century of pounding water in a mortar and pouring from empty to empty.
You should not take into account the testimony of witnesses (including even those that have appeared quite recently), since they are full of lies, inconsistencies and contradictions; they only mislead and create confusion. The value of all interrogations available in this “criminal case” is zero (their reliability cannot be verified).
Let's consider a few facts that cancel all the versions about the Dyatlov group that have been written over half a century.
Props
There are also a lot of confusion with the dates in the case. The tent was discovered on February 25 or 26 (witness accounts vary) on the slope of Mount Kholatchakhl (height 1079). According to the order to terminate the case - February 26.
At the “place where the group died,” the most convenient place for a tent is under a rock.
Strong winds blow in open areas, pass saddles and peak ridges. Try not to camp in such unprotected places. And if there are no options, look for natural shelter: a rock ledge, an ice break wall, a snow trough...
This is the best place for a tent.
And only an idiot would put it where they did.
And they put it here (on the slope) not far from the rock.
Any person who knew the members of the group knew that they were not idiots in terms of setting up a camp, setting up tents, etc., they had experience and knowledge in this area. The prop men turned out to be idiots.
On March 2, a storage shed (food warehouse) was found. Just as phony.
Labaz.
From the storage shed inspection report:
The storage shed is located where the group spends the night, well covered with prepared firewood, lined with cardboard and spruce paws. At the storage shed, skis, one pair, are stuck in the snow, with a torn gaiter hanging on the toe of the ski.
Nobody makes warehouses like this. Boiled sausage 4 kg, butter 4 kg... in a “container” - this is a feast for all the surrounding animals. This “storage store” was made and described by idiots.
On February 26 or 27 (witness testimony varies, protocol dated February 27) they found Doroshenko, Krivonischenko and Dyatlov, and in the evening of the same day - Kolmogorova. March 5 (according to witness testimony) - Slobodina, and all the others (Dubinin, Zolotarev, Kolevatov, Thibault-Brignolle) only on May 4 (according to the resolution to terminate the case, protocol dated May 6), and practically in the same place.
There is no protocol for the discovery of Slobodin’s body in the criminal case. According to the decision to terminate the case, the tent and the bodies of the first, including Slobodin, were discovered on February 26.
From the available photographs it is clear that people had already been delivered to this very “place of death” in the form in which they were later “found.” They are crippled, shoeless, half naked, with cut trousers, and so on. Many have cadaveric stains and damage characteristic of traces of post-mortem transportation. There are also traces of snow accumulation, slightly smoothed by the blizzard.
And most importantly, there are no traces of blood at the discovery site.
This whole search operation is nothing more than a fiction. Volunteers and outsiders were sent to look where they would not find anything, and that part of the “pathfinders” who were in the know - they are also prop men and delivery people - searched “where necessary.” First, they “found” (i.e. delivered) the first members of the group, and in May - the remaining ones.
Pay attention to the body of Krivonischenko, allegedly found under a cedar tree and moved to a more convenient place near the rock (remnant).
The bodies of Doroshenko and Krivonischenko under the cedar tree.
Bodies by the rock. In the foreground is Krivonischenko, in the background is Doroshenko, between them is Dyatlov (covered), to the left on Dyatlov is Kolmogorov (head covered).
In reality, Krivonischenko was first photographed along with other bodies on the site near the rock (that is, they were just delivered to the place), then transferred under the cedar tree and filmed there. He is wearing a shirt and the remains of underpants. On the site, the shirt is neatly put on and less snowy, under the cedar it is wrinkled, pulled up and covered in snow, the legs are more shabby and sloppy. No one will carry a corpse and then carefully straighten its loose underwear.
In this photo, the location of the corpse relative to the cedar does not correspond to the photographs above. It was either just brought, or it was moved from the place of discovery and is about to be carried away.
The layout and photography went like this: first, the bodies and things were taken to the pass, unloaded in a common heap, then they were dragged along the slope, while simultaneously filming a report on the “search operations” during which people and things were allegedly collected. We set up a tent, scattered some things, and a pile of other things, outerwear, shoes - everything remained in a common heap in the tent. This means that the things were delivered in one heap. How it was delivered (by helicopter/all-terrain vehicle/magic carpet) is not so important. All these “findings” were filmed over more than one day.
After the final layout, Dyatlov’s group was left for some time under a blizzard or snowfall.
Photos of Dyatlov’s “digging up” were taken on different days.
In this photo the body was just put back in place.
These days, a few days later (after the snow had fallen), they came to dig it out.
There was enough snow on the bodies of Krivonischenko, Doroshenko and Dyatlov, since they lay lower, but not enough on the bodies of Kolmogorova and Slobodin, I had to work with a shovel.
Kolmagorova’s body was placed in a hole and left for some time under a snowstorm (wind-blown snow is clearly visible). We took the first photo, covered the body with snow and took the second photo. Thus, two photographs created the appearance of digging.
The body lay in the depression for some time (several days perhaps).
Covered with snow.
Slobodin’s body also had to be buried and removed in order to pass it off as the opposite.
Slobodin's body is buried.
In May, a prop flooring was “discovered” next to the corpses.
From the protocol for the discovery of corpses:
Six meters up the stream, following traces of spruce branches, a flooring was discovered at a depth of 3 to 2.5 meters. The flooring consists of 14 fir and 1 birch tops on snow. Things were found on the flooring.
In the 1st photo they laid clean (without snow) tops and a couple of rags, in the 2nd photo they sprinkled it with snow and put things on top, in the 3rd photo they rolled things in snow, otherwise it doesn’t look believable.
Condition of bodies
The first ones found were undressed, beaten, with bruises and abrasions, but the bodies were intact. They either fell under the snow and died shortly before, or died a long time ago, but were in the cold. The corpses are in a state of rigor.
Rigor mortis is caused by post-mortem chemical processes in muscle tissue and manifests itself in hardening and stiffness of the muscles of the limbs of a corpse, appears 2-5 hours after death, lasts on average 3-5 days.
Of the external factors affecting rigor mortis, environmental temperature is important. Low temperatures (-10°C) cause rapid rigor, as does high temperatures (over +70°C). In the latter case, it is more correct to talk about thermal rigor. At low temperatures, rigor rigor can persist for weeks. When a frozen corpse thaws, rigor also disappears.
Of all the dead, only one Kolmogorova has the typical dying pose of someone who died in the cold; rigor mortis of the others clearly did not set in here.
Kolmogorov.
Doroshenko.
Slobodin.
Dyatlov.
Krivonischenko.
From the autopsy report on Krivonischenko’s corpse:
The left lower half of the pants is missing up to the level of the knee joint, the edges of the fabric of the pants in the places where the pants break are uneven with charring of the fabric...
Where and how was he wearing long johns without trousers, so much so that the fabric around the hips was charred? Charring could only occur in a different position of the body and not at the site of discovery. Why are my underpants torn or cut? Who cut, tore, tried to put on or take off clothes? Avalanche? Animals? A flying saucer emitter? Only those who brought him here.
Those found in May were decomposed, therefore, before they were “found” they were not under the snow, but were brought from a warm room where they had time to rot. The time for this was a carriage; they were most likely delivered to the pass in April.
The bodies of Dubinina, Kolevatov, Zolotorev, Thibault-Brignolle in the stream.
Kolevatov, Zolotarev.
Dubinina.
The bodies cannot be in such different states if they died at the same time and were in the same conditions in the same place. This fact cancels all versions in which the death of the Dyatlovites occurs on February 1-2 in the snow at their location. They had different either the time of death, or the conditions for storing the bodies, or both.
Thibault-Brignolle (near body).
He did not decompose like other “May” bodies, that is, he was either here, but was held until May, or was stored in cold conditions, from where he was delivered along with Kolevatov, Zolotarev, Dubinina at the time of “finding”, or was alive and killed shortly before delivery to your location. Unlike the others, he was wearing warm trousers and a sweater, a hat, gloves and felt boots.
From the decision to dismiss the case:
The dead Thibault-Brignolle and Zolotarev were found well dressed, Dubinina was worse dressed - her faux fur jacket and hat were on Zolotarev, Dubinina's bare leg was wrapped in Krivonischenko's woolen trousers... Two watches were found on Thibault's hand...
After inflicting injuries on people, followed by murder, the props were able to dress the corpses, and they also dressed what didn’t fit or came off/torn during transportation and threw it away with the rest of the things.
Early cadaveric phenomena also include cadaveric spots, which form on the lower parts of the body within 12 hours after death (blood in the vessels flows down under the influence of gravity), in the first 3-4 hours they can flow when the body is turned over. Moreover, if the corpse was kept warm after death, the cadaveric spots are clearly visible; if in the cold, they are pale pink and do not flow anywhere. After 48 hours, the spots do not undergo any transformations other than putrefactive changes.
Typically, cadaveric spots have a dirty purple color with a predominance of various shades, depending on many reasons, including the cause of death.
— In asphyxial death, cadaveric spots have an intense bluish-violet color, like all the blood of a corpse, supersaturated with carbon dioxide.
— In cases of death from hypothermia and drowning in water, cadaveric spots have a pinkish tint, as the epidermis loosens and oxygen penetrates the blood forming oxyhemoglobin.
— In case of poisoning with methemoglobin-forming poisons (nitrates, nitrites, Berthollet salt, methylene blue and others) and at certain stages of decay, cadaveric spots have a gray-brownish tint.
All bodies should have cadaveric marks that are pale pink in the lower parts of the body relative to their position when found, provided that the persons died at the declared location. The positions of the group's bodies were shown in the photo above.
According to the medical examination reports, in all bodies the cadaveric spots are located on the back surface of the torso and limbs; the color of the spots does not correspond to the general picture of death from hypothermia.
From here we draw an unambiguous and irrevocable conclusion: after death, for 12 hours the bodies were lying on their backs in a warm room, during which time they managed to dry out, which is confirmed by clouding of the corneas and Larche spots in all of the first five. Rigor mortis set in at the same time, in the position in which the bodies lay.
The forensic expert did not have information in what position the bodies were found. He described what he saw, albeit with false conclusions. None of the group members died from hypothermia (freezing). Vishnevsky's spots only confirm the process of hypothermia (intravital), but do not confirm death from hypothermia.
Injuries and injuries
The first five bodies did not have obvious injuries, so they were “found” (i.e. delivered) first. The rest, most likely, were kept until May and buried down to the stream in order to hide injuries visible to the naked eye (the decomposed corpses must have been lying in the water for a long time).
We only messed up with Slobodin. The mechanism of his injury is impact flattening of the skull between two hard surfaces (he has widespread massive hematomas in both temporal muscles and a laterally flattened skull). When falling, such an injury cannot be obtained only by hitting the head from above, lying on something hard (or from the side, on the head pressed against the wall, for example).
Slobolin. Act of examination of a corpse.
1. Hemorrhages in the temporal muscles with penetration of soft tissues. 2. Small abrasions of brown-red color. 3. Two linear scratches under a dry brown crust. 4. The abrasion is brown-red in color. 5. Soft tissue of the tip of the nose under a dry cherry crust, traces of blood discharge from the nose. 6. The right half of the face is swollen with many small abrasions, the left - with small abrasions. 7. Sediment of protruding parts of soft tissues. 8. The area of sedimentation is brown-cherry in color. 9. Lips are swollen.
From the autopsy report of Slobodin:
The pleural cavities contained up to 1 liter of bloody fluid...
Autopsy reports on corpses: Doroshenko, Krivonischenko, Dyatlov, Kolmagorova.
All five of them had frostbite of degrees 3 and 4 on their fingers.
The crimson color of frostbitten hands appears during a person’s lifetime, after he is warmed up and blood flow is restored in frostbitten areas of the body. If the hands (like any part of the body) are frostbitten at the same time as death from the cold, then they will remain white. Wherever their hands froze, those people whose fingers turned black, after that they found themselves in a warm place, a room, and remained alive for a time sufficient for the formation of these purple spots on their hands, tumors, and bruises on the body. These spots on the hands, interpreted by the forensic expert as frostbite, do not confirm death from cold in the place and time considered by the official and alternative versions; on the contrary, they refute them.
But color does not necessarily indicate frostbite, it can also be compression, burns, or injuries... - the expert is prohibited from facts indicating death in another place.
The acts also describe numerous wounds and abrasions received by people during their lifetime. How? Did you run and hit “rocks, ice, etc.”? Moreover, they are not found anywhere during the February snow cover. These are the most common traces of lifetime beatings.
The last four people had injuries incompatible with life, and they were inflicted with hands and feet quite professionally. The creatures who mocked people were not modest; they understood perfectly well that they would not suffer any punishment for this.
Dubinina
Dubinina. Act of examination of a corpse.
Injuries to the chest - fracture of II, III, IV, V ribs on the right along the midclavicular and midaxillary line, fracture of II, III, IV, V, VI, VII ribs on the left along the midclavicular line (possibly from jumping with one's feet onto a lying body).
1. Soft tissues in the area of the brow ridges, on the bridge of the nose, orbits and the left temporomygomatic region are absent, with the bones of the skull exposed. 2. Soft tissue defect measuring 4x4 cm with exposure of the parietal bone. 3. Eyeballs are missing. 4. The nasal cartilages are flattened. 5. The soft tissue of the upper lip on the right is absent, exposing the edge of the upper jaw. 6. There is no tongue in the oral cavity. 7. On the outer and anterior surface of the left thigh, in the middle third, there is a diffuse bluish-purple bruise in an area measuring 10x5 cm, with hemorrhage into the thickness of the skin (not on the diagram).
From the autopsy report on Dubinina’s corpse:
When palpating the neck, unusual mobility of the horns of the hyoid bone and thyroid cartilage is determined...
The horns of the hyoid bone are unusually mobile - XXXXXXX (printed over the word “broken”), the soft tissue adjacent to the hyoid bone is dirty gray in color. The diaphragm of the mouth and tongue is absent. The upper edge of the hyoid bone is exposed.
From this it follows that the hyoid bone is broken. This only happens with manual strangulation.
Kolevatov
Kolevatov. Act of examination of a corpse.
1. In the area of the eye sockets and brow ridges there is no soft tissue with exposure of the bones of the facial skull. 2. The cartilages of the nose are soft to the touch, have unusual mobility, the base of the nose is flattened. 3. Behind the right ear there is a penetrating wound measuring 3x1.5x0.5 cm. 4. The neck is deformed in the area of the thyroid cartilage. 5. In the area of the left knee joint, on the inner surface, there is diffuse hemorrhage into the underlying tissue (not on the diagram).
From the autopsy report on Kolevatov’s corpse:
The pleural cavities contained up to 500 ml. bloody fluid.
The mechanism of injury is bruise of the lungs with their edema. Perhaps also a jump with the legs, only on the back of the person lying down, so the ribs are not broken.
Zolotarev
Zolotorov. Act of examination of a corpse.
Injuries to the chest - fracture of the II, III, IV, V, VI ribs on the right along the peri-thoracic and mid-axillary line with hemorrhage (possibly from jumping with one's feet onto a lying body).
1.Eyeballs are missing. 2. In the area of the brow ridges and eye sockets there is a rounded soft tissue defect with exposure of the skull bones. 3. Soft tissue defect measuring 8x6 cm with exposure of the parietal bone.
From the autopsy report on Zolotarev’s corpse:
The pleural cavities contained up to 1 liter of liquid dark blood.
Thibault-Brignolles
Thibault. Act of examination of a corpse.
1. In the area of the right temple, there is a diffuse hemorrhage in the temporal muscle, a depressed fracture of the temporoparietal region, in an area measuring 9x7 cm with a defect in bone tissue and the temporal bone measuring 3x3.5x2 cm (pressed into the cranial cavity). 2. Soft tissue defect of irregular oval shape measuring 3x4 cm with exposure of the alveolar edge of the upper bone. 3. In the area of the right shoulder there is a diffuse bruise measuring 10x12 cm with hemorrhage into the underlying soft tissue.
From the autopsy report of Thibault-Brignolle:
... in the middle cranial fossa a comminuted fracture of the right temporal bone was found with a divergence and transition of the bone crack into the anterior cranial fossa to the right supraorbital region of the frontal bone, the second crack passes along the anterior surface of the sella turcica in the area of the sphenoid process, going deeper into the thickness of the main bone, then passes into the middle cranial fossa on the left, with a discrepancy between the edges of the bone from 0.1 to 0.4 cm.
Traumatic brain injury from a blow with a blunt object, possibly a butt, since there are no visible injuries to the skin over the site of impact.
Having dealt with the listed injuries, there is no point in attributing the injuries to others to accidental falls or bruises on stones, ice, etc.
There are many more details, but these are already enough to conclude: people were kidnapped, killed and taken to the declared place of death.
There is a number of indirect evidence in favor of the fact that Thibault was killed last and lived until approximately the second half of February (maybe a little longer). Maybe he helped the killers with the first bodies. Unlike the others, he was warmly dressed in a full set of his clothes, before his death he walked to relieve himself (his urine was empty), the stubble on his face had grown to 1 cm (in his hiking photographs it is light, no longer than 1 mm).
Radioactive dust and more
The case also includes a physical and technical examination of clothing and parts of corpses, which revealed a slightly elevated content of radioactive substances on individual samples of clothing, which, in turn, has absolutely nothing to do with the murder of members of the Dyatlov group. This was a “normal” background for those years in the Sverdlovsk region. In the Kyshtymsky outburst, half of the region was covered; in the “official” exclusion zone, back in 1958-59, the top layer of earth was plowed up and buried. Any person and any item of clothing could contain an elevated background. Krivonischenko, whose sweater was “off scale” (was on Dubinina), took a direct part in eliminating the consequences of the Kyshtym accident (as they broadcast on the Internet).
There is also a clipping from the newspaper “Tagilsky Rabochiy” about balls in the sky (witnesses of the balls , , , , , ) and the testimony of the ambulances about these same balls, added to the case for the heap after it was closed (interrogation dated May 29, 1959).
Excerpt from the newspaper “Tagilsky Rabochiy”
This is generally tinsel that does not carry any semantic meaning. Only woodpecker experts need it, together with their expertise, to attach it to their missile/weapon/Martian/etc. versions.
Despite the facts presented above, on May 28, 1959, the criminal case was dismissed for lack of evidence of a crime. The imitation of the investigation was completed, many rumors were thrown into society, and in the era of glasnost and perestroika, two carefully preserved volumes of fiction entitled “Criminal Case of the Death of Tourists in the Otorten Mountain Region” were issued, which anyone can now purchase.
Continue reading here.
Author: Alexander Beresnev
Just friends?
No one else dared to cure the heartthrob from infidelity. Some girls even tried to stay away from the handsome man, understanding the power of his charm and fearing that they would find themselves in the same situation that the two previous spouses had already experienced.
Satire theater actress Yulia Dzherbinova thought so too. For a long time they perceived each other only as friends. We worked together in performances, went on tour, supported each other as friends, shared secrets and learned to understand each other perfectly.
Evgeny Dyatlov, wife and children. Personal life
In the personal life of Evgeny Dyatlov there were many affairs, which he started with ease, even in those periods when he was a family man. Both the first and second wives of Evgeniy Dyatlov suffered a lot from his infidelities, and the fact that his first two marriages broke up was quite logical.
He met his first wife Daria Yurgens (Lesnikova) during his student years. In the fourth year they got married, but did not live long. After the birth of her son, Daria went to her parents in Mariupol for a while so that the baby would receive adequate nutrition, and living there with the child would be much more comfortable than in a small dorm room.
According to the actor’s wife, life with Evgeniy was unbearable; not only did they live very hard financially, but he also cheated on her with other women. Daria learned about this from Dyatlov himself, who decided to confess to his wife about cheating as soon as she returned from her parents.
In the photo - the actor with his first wife Daria Yurgens
Despite the fact that after this, in order to make amends, Dyatlov not only broke up with his mistress, but even left the theater, where she also worked and got a job at the Youth Theater, where his wife served, this did not affect family relationships for the better - Evgeniy , as he cheated on his wife, he continued to do so, which Daria was periodically told about by well-wishers.
The son Yegor, born in this marriage, after the divorce remained with his mother, who after some time forbade Evgeniy to meet with the child, because he had another dad - Daria’s new husband. In order to completely deprive Dyatlov of his rights to his son, Yurgens did not even file for alimony, although she later accused Evgeny of not supporting the child financially.
Only seven years later, when Dyatlov’s ex-wife separated from her second husband, actor Pyotr Zhuravlev, did she allow Evgeny to meet with Yegor. However, the time until father and son communicated alienated them from each other, and Yegor no longer considered him as a dad, and only in recent years, when his son became an adult, their relationship improved a little.
In the photo - Dyatlov and Yulia Dzherbinova
Evgeniy Dyatlov’s second wife, Ekaterina, immediately after marriage took his last name. She gave birth to the actor’s second son, Fyodor, but this marriage also fell apart quickly - although Evgeny did not tell his wife about his infidelities, she found out about everything herself, and did not want to tolerate it.
Now the actor is married again, and this marriage is his longest. Yevgeny Dyatlov’s third wife, actress of the Satire Theater Yulia Dzherbinova, has been with him since 2007, and is still very afraid that he will become interested in some other woman.
They met nine years before the wedding - Dyatlov was invited to the theater where Dzherbinova served to participate in the play “Dangerous Liaisons” in which Evgeniy and Yulia were partners. However, at first Dyatlov did not make any impression on his future wife, and only some time later, during a tour, a romance broke out between them. Despite the fact that at that time Evgeniy was married, Yulia was also not free, they were powerless in the face of the passion that flared up between them.
In the photo - Evgeniy with his wife and daughter
Returning to St. Petersburg, they settled in a hostel, and Yulia completely dissolved in her husband - she took on all everyday problems in order to free Evgeniy for creativity, together they went on tour, Dyatlov’s wife accompanied him when he went to concerts. The wife did this not only to always come to her husband’s aid, but also because she was always very jealous of him.
Yulia could not get pregnant for a long time, and only in 2007, with the help of IVF, did the couple finally become parents to a daughter, Vasilisa. Now the actor seems to have finally achieved harmony in life, and no longer runs around, finding joy in communicating with his beloved wife and daughter.